Imran: Could you speak of knowing when to / gracefully departing with the contrasting Ar Phazaron and Aragorn in the Akallabeth of the Silmarillion? in the light of "we've added years to life, not life to years." Further, the devil who seduces us to do vile deeds to increase our longevity as Tolkien says in the story of Sauron and the building of Meneltarma
You're drawing a very insightful parallel between the contrasting reactions to mortality in Tolkien's "Akallabêth" and a modern sentiment about longevity. Let's unpack that:
Ar-Pharazôn vs. Aragorn: Facing Mortality
"We've added years to life, not life to years"
This modern sentiment speaks to a similar concern:
Sauron's Temptation and the Desire for Longevity
Connecting the Themes
Imran: Now please,a case for the relevance of Tolkien as seen through this research paper (the gift of mortality).
The author of the paper makes a case for the relevance of Tolkien by focusing on his exploration of mortality, a theme that resonates with contemporary debates about aging, longevity, and the meaning of life[cite: 33, 34, 35, 36, 37].
Here's how the author builds that case:
Tolkien's Insight into Mortality: The author argues that Tolkien's works, particularly The Lord of the Rings, offer profound insights into the human condition by centering on mortality[cite: 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32].
The Gift of Mortality: The author emphasizes Tolkien's concept of mortality as "the gift of the One to Men," highlighting that Tolkien doesn't shy away from the pain of death but presents it as an integral part of the human experience[cite: 17, 18, 19, 20].
Mortality vs. Immortality: The paper contrasts the portrayal of mortal beings, like Hobbits, with immortal or long-lived beings, such as Elves and Ents, to illustrate how mortality shapes their perspectives and actions[cite: 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64].
Relevance to Contemporary Debate: The author connects Tolkien's themes to the modern debate between "mortalists" and those who advocate for overcoming death through scientific advancements, suggesting that Tolkien's work offers a valuable perspective on this issue[cite: 33, 34, 35, 36].
In essence, the author argues that Tolkien's exploration of mortality in The Lord of the Rings is not just a fantasy trope but a relevant commentary on the human condition, prompting readers to consider the value of mortality in their own lives.
Imran: What good amidst these o me, o life?
Both documents touch upon the theme of finding value and meaning in the face of mortality, though from different perspectives:
Tolkien's View (from "The Gift of Mortality.txt"): Emphasizes that the "good" in mortality lies in its ability to direct human focus toward humbler, more immediate, and ultimately more hopeful aspects of existence, such as family, community, and the cyclical renewal of life. [cite: 65, 66, 67]
Bô Yin Râ's View (from "vol2-no1-37.pdf"): Focuses on the spiritual journey beyond physical existence, suggesting that the "good" lies in understanding the nature of this transition and preparing oneself for the continuation of life in a spiritual form. [cite: 90, 91, 92]
In essence, Tolkien finds the "good" in mortality within the context of earthly life and its continuation through generations, while Bô Yin Râ sees the "good" in mortality as a transition to a greater spiritual reality.